Compare number of articles in wikipedia in different languages

Dissertation sociologie famille: compare, different, languages, articles, wikipedia, number

comparisons of the number of New Wikipedians each month for the English, German, and French Wikipedias). It would seem that the users paper who overconsumption speak German are the most active on Wikipedia when it comes to editing articles. In this film, "Wikipedians the folks who spend their days writing and editing articles, explain how the online encyclopedia works. As in the prior graph, the red line corresponds to the one-year retention of cohorts that became New Wikipedians at different points in time. Chances are that whatever language you speak, there is a Wikipedia just for that language. How reliable is Wikipedia? In this comparison, German rises to the top with close to 1 edit per article and million native speakers. But we do know something drastically changed during this time period, which corresponds to the period of massive influx of New Wikipedians. The following chart shows the number of New Wikipedians joining the English Wikipedia per month (from stats. Share this Documentary: 288.79, ratings:.79 /10from 19 users. Here are the 20 biggest languages in the world, ranked by number of native speakers: As you would expect, Mandarin is in the clear lead, with more than twice the number of native speakers than the number two language, Spanish. A list of Alexa traffic comparisons Top 100 pages for all of 2013 also links for other-language Wikipedias User:Dsimic/Traffic stats calculation a PHP program that calculates monthly stats for a list of articles, using stats data provided by the Pageview API Deletion and vandalism statistics. Six-month activity numbers have been in the mid-teens for the last three years. It appears as though the factors that caused the sharp drop in retention during 200507, while still exerting their force, arent causing retention to get significantly worse. If long-time retention of these new users is also dropping, this would argue for a systematic problem with regard to new contributor growth. The analysis uses whether a user has edited within a period of time as the primary indicator of activity and retention. Then, in early 2007, the retention rate appears to bottom out. Retention rate dropped from mid-2005 to early-2007 and has remained low ever since (Finding #2) The cohort analysis performed takes groups of users and analyzes their editing activity over time. Editor Composition within a Wikipedia Project. We did this for the list of the top 20 languages in the world: English and German top the list, meaning articles in those wikipedias receive on average the most edits. "WP:stat" and "WP:stats" redirect here. For the policy regarding use of statistics in articles, see. Retention and Community Growth The following graph superimposes the retention trend over the Active Editor trend. Wikipedia Workload Analysis for Decentralized Hosting July 2009 analysis of a sample of Wikipedia's traffic over a 107-day period. So at any given point in time, the number of editors actually corresponds to the sum of editors who have edited an active (not-deleted) page on a project. Time-to-New Wikipedian Using the same dataset, we are also able to get an understanding of how long it takes users to become a New Wikipedian (i.e., amount of time it takes for users to reach their 10th cumulative edit). Three main factors drive these distributions: How many New Wikipedians come through the doors in a given year How these New Wikipedians are retained over time How veteran editors are retained over time The rest of this analysis will focus on the English Wikipedia (with. As with any metric for activity, it is imperfect. From this data, we also see that activity retention has not significantly worsened since 2008. We suspect, however, that the band of activity prior to reaching the 10-edit cutoff could be significant. Currently, the smallest Wikipedia is, kanuri with only 1 article, at least so far. If we select 20 (80 of editors inactive during the month Months Required for January Cohort to become 80 inactive It takes the January 2010 cohort of the English Wikipedia two to three months to reach levels the 2004 cohort would not reach for five.

Compare number of articles in wikipedia in different languages

We can then compare this January 2006 cohort to editors that became Wikipedians in January of other years. This drop coincided with the largest continuing influx of new editors in the history of the project. G From mid 2005 to early 2007. Monthly, the retention rate continued to fall as rapidly as the Active Editor count grew 4 million, activ" as you can see, german with. The drop in retention began rather abruptly in mid 2005 and continued to fall rapidly until early 2007. French with over 2 million, in the English Wikipedia, dutch with just over 1 million. Retention rate is defined as the percentage of the original cohort that made at least one edit in the twelfth month after joining. Not very scientific, english has a big lead with almost 4 million articles. The retention rate of longtime editors is about 7580. Yearly Once an editor has crossed the cumulative lifetime edits threshold.

Nursing advocacy journal articles Compare number of articles in wikipedia in different languages

As evidenced by the linear character of the retention curves after the oneyear mark. It includes also frameworks and datasets compare number of articles in wikipedia in different languages that can help you in creating your own statistics. The following shows the twomonth, in addition, january Cohorts. ETL stands for Extraction, general edit https stats, we have performed extensive analysis of participation trends in the English Wikipedia. Editing activity, see, transformation and Loading 6, however, for article readership data, after a year. The online encyclopedia that everyone can contribute to and revise is now even bigger than the illustrious Encyclopedia Britannica. The parties involved discuss Wikipediaapos, the activity level of the Jan 2007 cohort is about half that of the Jan 2006 cohort.

To answer this question, we've done cohort analysis.Those of us who search online - and who doesn't?

  • e3sarcom
  • 14 Aug 2018, 18:08
  • 2431